On 5/31/05, Mark Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So basically 6.x seems to work in what I would consider the 'sensible' > way...
No, 6.x did assignment by value and return by value. It just did argument passing by reference by mistake. I'm not sure that people "got used to it" - there's certainly plenty of notes out there that arrays are handled by value but structs are handled by reference. I think very few people noticed the bug that arrays were passed by reference simply because assignment always copied them. I'd bet that passing an array to a UDF in CF5 was by value too... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
