Tim, Do you work in the Government Sector?
If you do, then you may find that asking the same question on the yahoo group "Intranet Peers" to be of some use. Cheers, >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/01/05 11:47 am >>> Hi Everyone, A bit off topic, but given the number of people here working on large sites I thought I'd ask... What procedures/systems do you have in place for reviewing content on your sites? Most CMS's out there have the basic capabilities of expiring or flagging content for review after a certain time, but what about triggering reviews in relation to, say, product changes? Do you have general content review periods? Is someone responsible for locating content to be reviewed and is it automated? Have you distributed responsibility for content management or do you have a centralised editor? I've been doing content management for several years now, but to be honest I haven't seen a lot of good systems or procedures for systematically reviewing published content. It'd be interesting to get some feedback from others out there. TIA Tim --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
