Quick question. Sorry if it has already been addressed. In Hals book discovering CFCs he makes note of the encapsulation problem with the this scope. He notes a work around, and also notes the work around's short comings. However, there is no mention of a private scope? Is that something new....or have I missed the boat all together? BRB - off to finish Hal's book =) Its a good read.
Thanks, I apologize if this (pun intended) has been a rehash. Take care, Justin -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CFCDev] this.scope vs private.scope I agree with you, Sean. In the broader OO community, the use of getters/setters is standard and getting into that habit seems to me very good advice. Hal Original Message: ----------------- From: Sean A Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:24:12 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CFCDev] this.scope vs private.scope My personal view is that the goal should be encapsulated data - using set/get and non-public data. During the transition, as you start to use CFCs to add more structure to your applications and get used to the way they work, using "this" scope is simpler and may help you get up to speed with CFCs faster. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
