For instance,
<event name="quoteEvent" type="FuseboxMXII.framework.FuseactionEvent">
That's not from Mach II - that's from Fusebox MX.
This breaks the idea of storing CFCs in /com/hostname/app/wibble/rar, which
for anything other than a small site is essential to keep things organised.
Well, the argument could be made that MachII.framework.Xyz is acceptable because it's a 'standard' framework and doesn't belong to a company and it should be available to all applications on server...
However, your point is well taken and com.mach-ii.framework.Xyz would be more in keeping with 'best practice'. I'll mention it to Ben & Hal since I'm already giving them feedback on other Mach II issues...
What are other peoples thoughts on this - I'm sure the Mach guys must have a
good reason, but the dev. process seems rather closed.
I suspect that's just because they haven't had time to finish the web site to enable feedback. You can always email them directly - they're very helpful and open to suggestions (IMO).
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
