--- "Paul Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok... So effectively it is a private property of the object > > (ie one that can't be retrieved by referencing the > > object.variable_name)?
Yes. As such, the 'unnamed' scope lets you get some way towards implementing 'proper' OO encapsulation. > And to scope it locally to a function, you have to set it with var > <variable_name>? Yes. > To me that seems the wrong way round... (sorry MACR), but surely, > you want > the default setting of a set variable to be scoped locally (ie > within the > function), not across the whole component...? I suspect that's been debated before and is just about to be debated again :-) Andy. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
