As long as the CFC
methods are purely display then the Flash Remoting issue doesn't exist--they can
still access the business logic/data cfc which presumably the display cfc is
using.
As long as the CFC
is purely for display then I personally see no problem with using
it.
I haven't read much
about it, but since MachII is all CFC based, does it use CFC's for display or
still CFM's?
Sam
----------------------------------------------
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
----------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Raymond Camden
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Display CFC (aka CFC for display purposes)Actually, there was a very good argument against this pre-RedSky. If you cached the CFC you would lose the ability to output.Another reason to not output... and thiis just something to remember, not really an arguments against using output at all - but if you output instead of returning, Flash Remoting can't use the method. Again, it's not a big huge deal, but it's something you _should_ remember before using output.
