Certainly ColdFusion should not always do what a database can do better, but I don't think that has anything to do with how many methods you have. From the sounds of it the overhead is in some CF looping construct that is doing conditional logic on a string -- so, although CF might have some issue it doesn't sound like it's a CFC issue.
But, without any of your code posted here or on the web forums it's not possible to give truly constructive feedback. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of St�phane Bisson > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [CFCDev] ColdFusion MX visite SQL 2000 Performance Issues > > > Hi gang, I'm writting you tonight because I just thing after > having created > 70 CFC methods... that ColdFusion MX is really not fast enough to deliver > the result.... no body has been taking about that I think...I was > putting to > much of CF codes.... now I use only SQL is the main driver because it's so > fast!... I would like to put more CF codes in my CFC methods... but I know > for sure, that if I put to much CF codes... it will take to much time to > execute.... so just read my post and as usual I will be happy to see any > comments... > > http://webforums.macromedia.com/coldfusion/messageview.cfm?catid=3 > &threadid=670957#2414950 > > Stephane ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
