> Hmm, I deleted your original problem email. Remind me what problem you are seeing?
Problem solved. The code in my last email works fine now. > Flash Remoting makes effectively stateless calls to the equivalent of web services and works independently of the back end server technology (so it can all CF, Java, .NET, PHP...). Therefore it can have no knowledge of shared scopes. I understand what you are saying. It sounds na�ve, but I thought it would be effective if a Flash presentation layer could interact with the application and session scope in the same way as a CFML presentation layer. Fully interchangeable, without changing, or adding any CFC code, such as the flashgateway.cfc. Vinny, P.S. I am an interimmanager/projectmanager interested in, and trying to understand, software architecture and engineering. I am not a professional developer. If my questions are too simple just let me know. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean A Corfield Sent: woensdag 4 februari 2004 20:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [CFCDev] implementing Sean Corfields data access pattern without mach-ii On Feb 4, 2004, at 1:13 AM, Kairoh! wrote: > Sean: restarting the CF server did not help Hmm, I deleted your original problem email. Remind me what problem you are seeing? > To create a list of employees there are now 3 CFC's > involved: the flashgateway.cfc, the employeemanager.cfc and the > employeegateway.cfc. Yes, this makes sense. > I have read that Flash Remoting does > not provide a mechanism for directly accessing components stored in > application and session scopes. Flash Remoting makes effectively stateless calls to the equivalent of web services and works independently of the back end server technology (so it can all CF, Java, .NET, PHP...). Therefore it can have no knowledge of shared scopes. > Does this mean that there is no way to combine the flashgateway.cfc > and the employeemanager.cfc or reduce the number of cfc's in another > way while maintaining the pattern? The pattern is to use flashgateway.cfc as a facade for your employeemanager.cfc. The only way to avoid that is to have everything stateless and recreate the CFCs on every call (poor performance). > Sean, can we expect tighter integration between Flash Remoting and > Blackstone See above - what you're asking for doesn't really make sense. Regards, Sean ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
