> 1) I _could_ create a persistence based version if you guys > would find value in it. Generally, we don't persist our CFCs > as a rule due to some of their less attractive quirks and > because we use them a lot for WS calls. > This isn't a high - volume feature for us, so we don't mind > the overhead.
I think the point of point 1 was not to persist the CFC, but to persist the values. That way if the CFC itself is persisted, those values will not need to be recreated. -Ray ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
