> In MX 6.1, I can see your point. However, in MX 6.0, > functions were not > transaction-aware, so you had to cfinclude your queries to > achieve the same > effect.
A very valid point, though aside from CFMAIL getting totally hosed, I can't think of a reason to still be running 6.0. Anyone have figures as to the number of 6.0 installs still around? Just curious. Cheers, barneyb ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
