|
I hate to disagree with you Ray, but CFCs
without admin access are crippled. Seriously. You can’t effectively package,
extend or type-check CFCs without setting a mapping and using dot notation –
especially in a hosted environment (where naming conflicts are going to send
you over the edge quickly since CF favors the admin mappings in the discovery
process). Yes, you CAN use them… but you
really can’t build a decent system with them unless you can set at least
one mapping. Also remember I’m a BIG CFC fan –
I love the little buggers – but the CFC discovery process is tremendously
slanted towards admin access. They are simply not very useful in
situations where you lack that. Most CF hosts have come up with
workarounds or custom tools for this (although it still sucks that Macromedia
has yet to make any sort of recommendations to either the community or to
hosting providers for how to handle things so we’re stuck with multiple,
incompatible solutions). This, by the way, is the difference with
Data Source. Any host that uses CF has a system in place for setting up
datasources and they’re all pretty much the same. You can also
abstract data source names within an application to prevent code-rewrites in
the face of name conflicts – none of that is available with CFCs.
If you assume a CFC path and that mapping is taken in a shared environment you
simply have to rewrite all the code that uses it. (As an aside this is a
continuing problem with Java development in general and is not specific to CF.) But as much as I love CFCs I still see
this as a major issue – and the largest stumbling block for them to
become more widely accepted. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond Camden This is, without a doubt, one of the
silliest things I've heard here. It is absolutely untrue that Admin access is
required to use CFC. Mappings can greatly help your organization, but they are
not required. Shoot, by your logic, CF is completely useless because you can't
use a database w/o having access to the CF Admin (so as to add a datasource). |
- Re: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Lucian COZMA
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Kevin J. Miller
- Re: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Lucian COZMA
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Dan G. Switzer, II
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Kevin J. Miller
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Nathan Dintenfass
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Dan G. Switzer, II
- Re: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Ian Sheridan
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Jim Davis
- Re: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Massimo, Tiziana e Federica
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Jim Davis
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Raymond Camden
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Jim Davis
- [CFCDev] CFCs and Queries Alexander Sherwood
- RE: [CFCDev] CFCs and Queries Barney Boisvert
- RE: [CFCDev] CFCs and Queries Alexander Sherwood
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Raymond Camden
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Jim Davis
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Dan G. Switzer, II
- RE: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Raymond Camden
- Re: [CFCDev] component extends object with rel... Massimo, Tiziana e Federica
