Thanks Barney. 3 more questions: 1) Should I use the fully qualified typename, or just 'component'? 2) Is this typename public and documented? 3) Is this type name valid for a method's return type and an argument's type?
-- tim http://www.toolmantim.com Quoting Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "WEB-INF.cftags.component" is the base type. > > Cheers, > barneyb > > > -----Original Message----- > > What's the Java 'Object' type equivalent for CFCs (for a > > base/non-extending > > cfc)? ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
