At 01:23 PM 7/21/2004, you wrote: That is true, however just because NASA may have their own methodologies, doesn't mean that it is wrong just because it is not a standard in larger development arena.
>For example, I know that NASA on certain projects has thrown out the possibility of >adopting a known standard from the rest of the community because either it was >lacking in completeness or was incompetent. And as such they have written their own >SLP that may or may not resemble any known practice outside of NASA. That does not >make it any less viable a practice and be ignored just because a uniformed programmer >doesn't agree with it and thinks a better well known standard should be adopted. But does NASA support Fusebox and the FLiP process? -- True ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
