> I haven't seen the code behind Machii, but wouldn't it make sense to use a > mapping with a dynamic name? That way you don't have to worry about this? > (Well, you do, but it takes all of one second to change to a new mapping > name.)
I don't believe it's possible to make the mapping dynamic if you want to use all the features of CFCs and maintain a package structure. I know that automatic type validation of component types (since the "type" attribute of CFARGUMNET can't be a variable) won't work and I don't believe that you can extend a CFC with a variable parent. You can do all of this if all of the CFCs are in the same package and you don't use full-qualified names to reference them... but where's the fun in that! ;^) Jim Davis ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
