On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:18:02 -0400, John D Farrar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yet, I am not much of a respecter of persons... so "I disagree" is > merely a statement... give me some facts.
I've mostly given up arguing with you because you have such strange views. Sorry but you seem to be very uninformed about the vast body of software engineering information out there and you persist with ideas that run counter to decades of well-tested and well-established best practices. > Hey... a poor implementation doesn't prove the concept to be bad! And if > this was such a bad idea, why didn't you blow the horn sooner? Again, you prove yourself to be uninformed - I've been objecting to the use of request scope from day one. > bigger question... is there a variable coding guideline in Mach II, good and > bad variable usage principles. There's a Development Guide up on LiveDocs representing best practices and a lot of experience (macromedia.com has a dozen Mach II applications, including some very high-traffic, mission-critical apps). > Does Mach II have a Framework that covers API > rules from coding methodology to presentation layer variable rules and > techniques? That question makes no sense. Mach II *is* a framework. > That is how I term Framework... Well, that's just confusing the issue then - why not use the same terms with the same meanings as the rest of the software industry? -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
