Brian wrote: >>That's fine if the CFC method is returning a string, >>But what if the method is returning a query? An array? A structure?
I've already acknowledged all that in my posts and offered a few ideas on how to deal with it. After the discussion, the best seems to me to simply recognize the inherent cost of adding xml format. It's good for MM to be aware of how their technology is being used/abused. Now that we've figured a way to use one component function 2 ways and ouput directly without xml tacked on, I'm fine with it. (But I'm seeing a bug under noted conditions that is outputting an empty wddx packet when nothing is returned, and that should be looked at.) All I can add beyond that is: I don't care about the int() function ;-) Actually, as he replied to my post, I would like to add as an aside that I greatly appreciate the time and effort Sean Corfield puts into answering questions, when I'm sure he's already incredibly busy at MM. I've lurked on many lists and learned a tremendous amount from his posts, and his website. He's a tremendous asset to CF and MM. Thank you, Sean. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
