and if you use a code generator tool like this http://www.cfczone.org/blogs/rob/index.cfm?mode=alias&alias=90 its not really so much code to write out :)
Doug On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:52:29 +0100, Nando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Just trying to figure out if I might run into > a problem I'm not seeing by doing things this way. > > Well, that's the whole point of encapsulation ... lots of people have run > into lots of problems violating encapsulation, (i'm one of them!) and you > really never know when or if you're going to run into them. Encapsulated > objects are reliable. Very reliable. Using THIS positions inter-dependent > code in different parts of your application in such a way that it can be > very difficult to see what's going on. > > I understand what you're thinking when you see an "inordinate amount of > code" - but it's my impression that CFAS running on a Java codebase handles > that type of code very efficiently from the performance gains i'm noticing > by using a hell of a lot of it in my applications these days. So don't let > the length of it mislead you. Once it's compiled, it's very fast. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Douglas Knudsen http://www.cubicleman.com this is my signature, like it? ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
