The problem with having a code generator is that you have to pick a way of doing things. As far as I can tell know one has come out with any particular "This is the best way" solution, so everyone is still rolling thier own.
So if some people want to get together and try to establish a standard then doing an automated or code generator would then be easy. Just my thinking on things. simeon On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 20:17:02 -0800, Phil Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:56:59 -0500, Stacy Young > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 75% man thats killer, what kinds of stuff are you creating?? > > > > Well once all the standard machinery is in place the actual biz logic is > > not usually all that much. (w/ regards to coding time, design and > > planning aside) > > > > Thanks for the link but I'd rather go straight CF for the > > solution...otherwise I might as well implement in Java completely. > > (ack!) There was talk about some cf solution a ways back but didn't hear > > much since. Guess I'll have to reserve myself a weekend and bang > > somethin' out! > > > > -S > > Rob blogged about this tool that was demoed at MAX. > http://www.cfcpowertools.com/cfcpowertools/Index.cfm?pagelet=display.content&numPageID=1 > Looks very nice. > > -Phil > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
