Yeah, best practices are only determined after a fair amount of time in which many variations can be attempted and poor choices weeded out.
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:29:20 -0800, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 23:02:46 -0700, Nathan Strutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As for best practices, without using Application.cfm (or at least > > trying not to) in a CF7 application, and with the need for similar > > functionality, I don't see why it's not a BP. It's pretty clean in > > design and with the ability to override just the methods you want, it > > seems pretty perfect. > > Only time will tell whether it becomes a best practice. Sometimes > something that seems really obvious as a nice clean approach later > turns out to be a maintenance nightmare... > -- > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ > Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ > Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme > Got Gmail? -- I have 49, yes 49, invites to give away! > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to > [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the > email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting > (www.cfxhosting.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > -- Paul Kenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjk.us ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
