In my CFCs, I *mostly need* to call an init(), therefore I *always" call an init() even if it doesn't do anything. I moved everything out of the pseudo-constructor area into a function and then I'm consistent throughout. YMMV
M!ke -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Kear Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 6:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CFCDev] cfc check On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:58:33 -0800, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Using the pseudo-constructor can get in the way of all > sorts of things. For example, when you try to use the CFC Browser > (/CFIDE/componentutils/componentdoc.cfm) it will cause the > pseudo-constructor to run! > [snip] So does that imply you generally avoid using the pseudo-contstructor approach in favour of explicitly calling an init() method? Or are there circumstances where the above comment doesnt apply? ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
