On Apr 4, 2005 11:12 AM, Peter J. Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jared and David are correct.  Although, IIRC....MX6.0 had issues with
CFCs and the private scope.

CFMX 6.0 did not have a private scope, just a public 'this' scope. If you used 'variables' scope inside a CFC, you got the calling page's 'variables' scope...
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/
Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/
Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away!

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood ----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to