Nolan,

Because of regulatory rules, MM employees are not allowed to comment
publicly on the merger until the quiet period has ended.

-Rob




"Nolan Erck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cfczone.org on 04/18/2005 10:19:38 AM

Please respond to [email protected]

Sent by:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]



To:    <[email protected]>
cc:


Subject:    RE: [CFCDev] A sad, sad day




My 2 centsâ



It depends on what those in charge saw as viable reasons to buy
Macromedia. If there is a particular product(s) they are interested in (or
interested in eliminating), then that will be a factor that we probably
donât have much info on yet.



I was a part of one merger/acquisition a few years ago that was anything
but friendly. From the outside it was very similar â one bigger company
buying a smaller one, to become this new entity, etc. The reality of it
was, the new parent company was only interested in 1 of our products, and
everything else (and everyone else working on other things) was done away
with in the coming months. So I feel itâs really tough to tell why one
company buys another, until we actually see what their intentions are.



Has anyone else noticed that the MM âregularsâ on this list havenât posted
anything about this topic on their blogs yet? Ben Forta made mention of
the acquisition, but did not add any additional commentary. ÂI did just
find SOME info in Mike Chambers blog (
http://www.markme.com/mesh/archives/007504.cfm) about this, but a lot of it
reads like official Stockholderspeak. But thatâs all Iâve seen thus far.









Nolan Erck
Web Developer/Programmer
Schools Financial Credit Union
(916) 569-5409 Office
(916) 569-2024 Fax
www.schools.org

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Rawlinson
Sent: Monday, April 18, 20059:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] A sad, sad day



I agree with Ryan. I personally don't think, as a CF developer, that this
news really impacts my future much.
I'm not worried at all.

First it was Allaire, then Macromedia, next Adobe. CF will continue on as
is I am sure. Adobe has no compelling reason
to do away with it - and only positive reasons to keep it.

It doesn't have any competing technolgies already under the adobe umbrella
- and will simply give Adobe a entry in a new market.

Bill

On 4/18/05, Ryan Duckworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I think that most ColdFusion programmers / managers are overreacting to
this announcement.

The programmers of CF 7 (BlackStone) are not likely to be let go because
of this.

Let's suppose that I was a manager at Adobe, I would see ColdFusion as a
great revenue stream, and I would want to retain those programmers and
project managers that have grown the subscriber base.

I think we as a community would be best off to be optimistic about this
because the individuals who built CF 6 & 7 are likely to still be in
charge of future releases.

In addition, I think it would be in the best interest of Adobe to keep
major players such as Ben Forta and many others actively involved in the
CF community & releases.

Ryan Duckworth
Macromedia ColdFusion Certified Professional
Uhlig Communications
10983 Granada Lane
Overland Park, KS 66211
(913) 754-4272


----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of
the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (
www.cfxhosting.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.rawlinson.us

If you want Gmail - just ask.
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of
the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting
(www.cfxhosting.com).

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may contain
privileged information exempt from disclosure under applicable law. The
information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, employee, or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please delete the message from your computer and immediately notify
the sender by telephone (you may call collect) at 916-569-5400 or by e-mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you.
b‹š­ë.nÇ+‰·¶‡q×N‹§²æìr¸›zÇu©Þ¨¥¶‡q×q÷3¢w¨®"¶a{
+v˲æìr¸›yÇÜuëÚØ^²æãyËh~Ø^zf¢”!B
ëâ§o …        š'{0q÷3¢w¨®§v˦ŠíyÖòUÇËbž
0ÁÇñ†‹-Šx¢`'j·!Š÷¨~Ø^Pƒzùb²Øjöåy«pà        šŠV«r¯yÊ&ýÇÜuëÜ}Ìèê+

Reply via email to