On 4/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The answer I received in the example previously provided was that it was > probably best to have the main object's DAO loop over and call each of the > sub object's DAO individually.
Yes, or even not have separate DAOs for the subobjects. If they only exist inside the composite object and have no relevance to anything else, there's no real need to create a separate DAO for them (since you are persisting them as part of the composite DAO already). KISS / YAGNI would favor having a single DAO for the composite object, only introducing subobject DAOs through refactoring *if* they needed to be exposed in the future. -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
