30-50 ms is nothing. If your users start complaining about fractions of a second, maybe it's time to find new users! :)
What really matters is how the app performs under load. Grab one of the free tools out there (JMeter, MS WAST, etc) and put 15-20 simultaneous requests on it. You may find that the slower solution performs better under load, or that the difference is negligable when the app is under load. -Dave >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/15/05 9:53 AM >>> Hi guys, When building your applications to what extent do you consider the total execution time important for a page? Is there a target time to aim at? Why do I ask? Well, my cfc/xml based solution runs slower by than my non-cfc/string parsing solution by about 30/50 ms. From a development/maintenance perspective I know I prefer the cfc/xml one but 30/50ms just seems like a lot. My current thinking is 1) Look at speeding up the current implementaion or 2) Keep with cfc's but drop the xml and wrap my string-parsing logic into a cfc (so at least it's a bit more organised) I'd love to hear other peoples view on this. Cheers, Pete (aka lad4bear) ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
