Half was assuming that the include was compiled into the results, and half was assuming that the include would execute on every request. Sheesh... and you wish you were smarter? Hehe.
I assume the mapping has the same name, yes? Just a different path. Does the compile capture the absolute path that the mapping points to or does it capture the relative path specified in the include? If it captures the absolute path and embeds that in the compiled code, that may be why. Hmmm... other thoughts, other thoughts...
I'll keep thinkin on it and feed you more suggestions as I come up with them.
Laterz,
J
On 5/16/05, Nando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jared,What you're saying seems to makes sense ... but looking into this more deeply, *some* CFC's in the same app with included UDF's are working. ! Now what? !And of course, there are many includes with relative paths within the app (that aren't within CFC's) that work. I just had a hunch that things might be getting confused because the CFC is called using a mapping.<sigh> Sometimes i wish i was a lot smarter than i am. </sigh>
--
---------------
-------------------------------------
Buy SQLSurveyor!
http://www.web-relevant.com/sqlsurveyor
Never make your developers open Enterprise Manager again. ----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).
CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
