On 6/21/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think he's talking about the 'arguments' scope in particular, as it > has weird quirks that aren't exhibited by any other CF scopes (i.e. > the ability to dereference like an array). StructKeyExists is still > the proper way to test for an optional argument; in that sense > treating arguments like a struct is the proper thing to do. Just > don't necessarily expect it to ALWAYS behave exactly like a "real" > struct. >
So then the arguments scope is sort of like a query (which I know isn't a scope, per se) where you can sometimes use array notation and sometimes use structure notation to access its members? Just curious. Regards, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
