> I don't quite get the implication in the diagram behind the (in contact : > Contact, in group : Group) part, ... yet.
That's saying you have two 'in' parameters name 'contact' and 'group', and they are of type 'Contact' and type 'Group' respectively. Here is is in Java syntax: public void myMethod(Contact contact, Group group) I'd highly recommend picking up a UML book. Not necessarily to learn UML for everyday use, but at least to understand the concepts, because they'll come through even in the simplest pencil'n'paper modelling sessions. cheers, barneyb On 7/22/05, Nando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is great. Sometimes i just don't know when / whether to take the > natural relationships "seriously" in a model, as in - Does a Newsletter have > Recipients (Contacts), or does a Contact have a Subscription to a > Newsletter. It's easy to get trapped in a sort of circular thinking and not > have any clear pathway out of it in a case like this. > > So what would just one of these methods look like? How would it work? > > AddContactToGroup() > > I don't quite get the implication in the diagram behind the (in contact : > Contact, in group : Group) part, ... yet. > -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
