At that point, all MM (or NA, for that matter) has to do is prove that they had a spec first (and you know they do), and your copyright won't stand up to anything. And heck, they could sue you for copyright infringement. So sounds like a lot of work for no reward.
cheers, barneyb On 8/6/05, Joseph Flanigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > published formal specification of CFML is a two-edged sword > > I am going to research, develop and publish the "Official ColdFusion > Language Specification". The specification will be a formal notation on the > language, CFL. This is something that does not exist. So it will be new > work. I will own the copyright on the specification. > > The work to research and develop the CFL specification will be > collaborative effort. Members of the collaboration will have rights to the > specification. Others will have to pay for rights. > > Joseph > > -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
