|
You should check out cfcPowerTools. cfcPowerTools is a web
based interface to your CFCs. With cfcPowerTools you can do the following:
cfcPowerTools makes
you more productive. Literally in a matter of minutes you can have fully
functional CFC, DAO, data entry form, and a database table. Use the batch CFC
generation functionality and you can convert multiple database tables into
functional CFCs in minutes! cfcPowerTools produces consistent,
predictable, and reliable code. Revisions to your
database layer and subsequent DAO layer can be handled by cfcPowerTools. cfcPowerTools is available at www.cfcpowertools.com.
You can download cfcPowerTools for a 30 day trial. Thanks Tom Schreck -----Original Message----- I've been using dao's, gateways, & beans for several months now. Initially it seemed like a very good solution to separating out code and it seemed like maintenance would be easier. Nowadays I'm not so sure that this is the case. Recently I had a project where I was creating a pdf form report. I had 4 revisions brought to me where extra fields were requested. The work flow went something like this: 1. Add/change fields in database 2. Add/change fields in bean (getter/setters, initialization code, validation code) 3. Add/change fields in gateway (selects) 4. Add/change fields in dao (select,insert, update) 5. Add/change fields in manager object that supplied the fields to the fdf generator. X 4 The amount of maintenance work hasn't diminished at all. It's increased! Recently I've been playing around with a bean creator made by Francis Scott. It queries the database for the table structure and will automagically create the DAO, gateway, and an input form. It works great, and you can easily use these as a base to create the rest of your needed code. Obviously, you'll need to create more specific functions in the gateway and input forms. What I was pondering was how to make this automatic. How could I create a cfc that, given a datasource and a table name, would automagically create a structure for that table, dynamically create the crud methods and simple gateway methods. You'd then extend this cfc to add additional functionality. The downside I see to this is that you'll be relying on loops inside queries to save all of the data. But the upside is that table changes would be immediately recognized once you reinstatiate your cfc. Also, I'm starting to lean more towards a TO vs a bean. Validation inside the bean seems clunky. Form data comes as a struct. Why not process it as a struct. A separate validation CFC seems to be a better fit. Again, this could extend another base cfc that would automatically understand basic database validations such as max length of varchar, valid numeric values for numeric type fields, nullable fields. Then on top of this, you could add your own business logic type of validations. Enough rambling for now. I think I'll try putting this together. Marlon -- Marlon "A mulatto, an albino, a mosquito, my libido" ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to
[email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the
email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting
(www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] |
- [CFCDev] Better way than dao, gateway, bean Marlon Moyer
- Re: [CFCDev] Better way than dao, gateway, bean Steve Bryant
- Re: [CFCDev] Better way than dao, gateway, bean Bill Rawlinson
- RE: [CFCDev] Better way than dao, gateway, bean Peter H
- RE: [CFCDev] Better way than dao, gateway, bean tom.schreck
- Re: [CFCDev] Better way than dao, gateway, bean Marlon Moyer
- RE: [CFCDev] Better way than dao, gateway, bean tom.schreck
