I'll agree with that. Email sucks for heated debate. No offense to me. OO is never the Right Answer. It's very often one of the best answers (especially if you're well versed in it's ways). But it brings nothing to the table you can't get some other way (or the same way, using some other name ;).
On 8/22/05, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can I assume you're trolling, and the discussion is over? > > Ok, let's start over. Obviously OO is a religion on this list, and > anybody that even hints at talking bad about it is the devil. I am > trying to be congenial and friendly, and offer up some interesting > questions and food for thought. But I guess it is hard to see my true > intentions in email, as always, so I am sorry if I caused you or anybody > any offense. > > Again, I said it before, and I'll say it again. I use CFCs all the > time, and I have learned a LOT from this discussion. I just think there > is a proper time and a place for OO, and extreme OO practices ought to > be weighed against other options to make sure they're the best thing for > the problem at hand. -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
