The java developers i work with have a fairly standardized pattern vocabulary because they tend to have read the same books/articles whatnot. That's not to say they don't have the occasional misunderstanding, but they're pretty rare and usually occur when they're discussing something pretty obscure.I gues it will take some time before the vocab of patterns as it applies to CF settles down - to coin a phrase, the cf dialect of the pattern vocabulary.
till then, don't take chances and make sure you're explaining or defining your terms somewhere. /t >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Kotek >Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 9:06 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Lines Between TO, Bean and BO? > >If the question is only asked internally then there's no problem. The >issue I was driving at is when you need to communicate with other >people. If my definition of transfer object is different from your >definition of transfer object, then at best we have to stop to get our >definitions in line, and at worst we will think we're talking about >the same thing when in reality we aren't. ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
