I'll second that - I actually wrote some code a (long?) while ago that enabled you to get multiple beans out from a query - it ended up being more trouble than it's worth.
I'll recommend not worrying about it if you don't have to. Mark On 9/14/05, Bill Rawlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > great point. don't reinvent the wheel if you dont' have to :O) > > On 9/13/05, RADEMAKERS Tanguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's worth mentioning that many languages that promote the "collection > > of objects" approach over the "record set or query" approach do so at > > least in part because the concept of a record set is not built in to the > > language - for example, if you wanted to pass a record set to the view > > layer of your java app, your view layer components would have to import > > java.sql.RecordSet, which would be messy (tier leakage - why should a > > view tier component know about a data-tier related concept?) > > > > Meanwhile, in cf, a query is a central concept of the language - you > > don't have to import anything and many tags like cfoutput and cfloop are > > tightly integrated with queries. Not only that, but lots of other tags > > and functionalities that have nothing to do with databases also produce > > queries - like cfdirectory, cfsearch - heck, even cfhttp. > > > > /t -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
