Just submitted a feature request to http://www.macromedia.com/go/wish/ requesting application specific mappings, quoting this thread, and several others.
Who knows - it may even amount to something ;o) Mark On 9/14/05, Nando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been contemplating it too. I took a good look at my code base and i > like your previous statement more and more ... that probably the best > approach is a composite of compromises. a CofC, if you will ... ;) > > I still have to do some experimenting to make sure everything works, but > right now i'm staying with dot notation, and if possible i'm going to retain > some packages - grouping any cfc's that are related via inheritance together > so the child obj's can find the parent. I still have to experiment to make > sure it will work, as i don't have enough experience with this yet. And yes, > the folder will be at the root level of the application. > > If application specific mappings happen, it'll be fairly easy to make the > change, as most of the code affected will be in the Factory(s). > > Application specific mappings have been asked for in an enhancement request > for some time. Not sure where to go and add my voice to that if i haven't > already. I asked for them in Tim Buntel's "Scorpio" blog as well. > > http://www.buntel.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=F1341353-4E22-1671-5B9 > 119B7EA89AD6F -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
