Re: [CFCDev] Form bean vs Transfer Object (repost)

[Richard Rodseth]

Thanks for your insights, Scott. When you say "the Model" , I assume your are referring to a specific CFC rather than a collection of BOs. (i.e. somewhat like the UserService in the Mach-II-Info example, which was also intended to support multiple UIs.) In a non-distributed web app, I don't see an issue with manipulating BOs in the controller, and I've read some posts objecting to the overuse of TOs in non-distributed apps. So it sounds like your issue is not so much accommadating multiple UIs, as the fact that one of them is a an RIA.

- Richard

On 9/12/05, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

(Note: I prefer to trade in TOs within Listener, in that to me i still regard the Listener as part of the view, thus prefer to keep the BO out of the picture within this zone as i tend to use the model via two UI's... CFMX for Unit Testing via Mach-II solution and FLEX for actual UI. So essentially the Listener and FlexGatewa/Facade.cfc act similiar in accessing the Model)

----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to cfcdev@cfczone.org with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.

CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).

CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm

An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org