RE: [CFCDev] inheritance advice

[Paul]

This is why I only rarely ask questions of this list…  you’re too smart for my own good.    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Stoner Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:22 PM To: CFCDev@cfczone.org Subject: Re: [CFCDev] inheritance advice   On 10/13/05, David Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The type checking is the most important feature, as it enables you to...   While your second solution is a resonable idea, why would you not marry it with compile time vaildation and your extended (improved) "method not implemented" error messages?  I agree that runtime interface validation/method checking would be a hog but there is no reason that the object cannot earn the right to "claim to implement" at compile time.   I dislike people who are intolerant of other people's cultures and the Dutch   ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to cfcdev@cfczone.org with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to cfcdev@cfczone.org with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org