How about Cache? To bad there is no native support for Cache in CF! Then we could put the XML in a database. HEH!!! Don't think that is what Joe meant though... but I sure would like to see that come to pass.
John Farrar -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cody Caughlan Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 9:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [CFCDev] CFSQLTool debate I agree with you Matt. Shoehorning the MachII XML into a DB would be a nightmare. Namely because the config is so flexible and the flow of an event is entirely based on the procedural-ness of the XML. You could "replicate" this flow using a dozen different tables, but it would be a logical *nightmare* and would immediately make MachII a "no-use" application since its so prohibitive to get started. I get the feeling that Joseph feels attacked by all the recent negative comments re: CFSQLTool (especially coming from Corfield). And rightly so, no one wants to hear their baby get insulted. But still. /cody ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). CFCDev is supported by New Atlanta, makers of BlueDragon http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
