Can't resist this one... heh! The difference between the two is obvious. One of them has an XML config file. I suspect it's running with Machii. ( big grin )
Other Thoughts on CFCUnit: http://www.cfcunit.org (Q) It doesn't deal with NON-CFCs does it? (More asking this one...) It sort of dropped off the map. Looks good, but looks like another cryogenic project waiting for spring thaw. You have to install and configure Machii. (Let's say that XML files aren't a deal breaker here... heh) It still is a big jump to not have a complete solution. It makes sense that it needs to be written with some standard and Machii is fine as the next for this type of task. It is ever frustrating to have to learn a whole methodology to customize it. Yet, the plain fact is that if it was written another way the same thing would be true but for different people. I want my tester (this would apply to both) to be able to generate a web service, XML file or something so the testing could be entered into a project tracking system. (Q) Has the distribution changed? I was under the impression that CFCUnit was going to be a pay for project rather than open source? Thoughts on CFUnit: http://cfunit.sourceforge.net/ I believe the type of CF files supported is broader here. (Wonder if they will be supporting flash remoting .as files and such???) ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
