Matt Woodward wrote:
I agree. At the moment we have the getPlugins/Listeners/Filters(), etc methods in the To-Do for 1.1.1 to help the CS's Mach-II plugin. Anything else boys?On 12/15/05, Peter J. Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wow Matt -- we need to talk more often. Last weekend (rather ironically), I started architecting MachBlog (no, really!). This doesn't surprise me. I wouldn't mind helping out -- I'd like Mach-II blog anyways... ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] |
- [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Locator vs. IoC/DI David Ross
- Re: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Locator vs. IoC/DI Joe Rinehart
- Re: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Locator vs. IoC... Brian Kotek
- Re: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Locator vs. IoC... Peter J. Farrell
- Re: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Locator vs.... Matt Woodward
- Re: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Locator... Peter J. Farrell
- Re: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Lo... Matt Woodward
- Re: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Servic... Chris Scott
- RE: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Se... Ben Nadel
- Re: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Locator vs.... Salvatore Fusto
- RE: [CFCDev] Factory vs. Service Locator vs. IoC/DI David Ross
