Jason Parkils everyone! Give him a hand! -Adam
On 12/22/05, Jason Parkils <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have already identified a potential competitve advantage over google. > Currently they store all their site data in custom databases. As everyone > knows, database access is notoriously slow. So if the metadata was moved > into ram (the "application" scope) onApplicationStart, you would be able to > perform deeper search functions in the same amount of time - getting you > better results. Nowadays, you could install several terabytes of ram on each > machine (64-bit computing) - so space shouldn't be an issue. The only thing > is that onApplicationStart will take several hours to load the data into ram > - but the servers will be clustered so that should only happen once. > > So no-one knows of any good CFCs to do google-style searching? The important > thing is that they are open source so that I can improve upon them. Are CFCs > even the best way to go? I don't mind doing it through TAGs or anything > else. I was just told that CFCs were the best. > > Also, is it worth it to get CF Enterprise edition for this or is Standard > ok? > > Jason Parkils > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to > [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the > email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting > (www.cfxhosting.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
