On 1/12/06, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/12/06, Cliff Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > it has no other analogues within the CF language. In fact, if you > > took someone from the CF5 world and showed them that syntax they'd > > probably think it'd result in a parser error.
You're right, my bad. But given that the use of scopes is so prevalent in every other area of CF I'm surprised the language design team decided against providing a local scope inside of the CFFUNCTION block. I don't really have a problem with "var" (and I use the "local pseudo scope anyhow") but it just feels a little out of place. -Cliff ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
