Hi. This is the qmail-send program at deliveredsolutions.co.uk. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: sh: line 1: clamdscan: command not found spamc: invalid option -- E vdeliver: Invalid or unknown virtual user 'sid.wood' --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: (qmail 15504 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2006 03:28:48 -0000 Received: from c.mx.deliveredsolutions.co.uk (213.146.130.132) by dev0 with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 03:28:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 30913 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2006 02:36:12 -0000 Received: from 199-231-128-19.rev.hosting.com (HELO DWS047.cflib.org) (199.231.128.19) by 0 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 02:36:12 -0000 Received: from pirnie.org ([64.142.43.48]) by cflib.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:07:34 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:02:16 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C63AF27E38B9C2000002C5pirnie.org" X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 00000001 - 80040546 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CFCDev] Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Precedence: bulk Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a MIME-formatted message. Portions of this message may be unreadable without a MIME-capable mail program. --9B095B5ADSN=_01C63AF27E38B9C2000002C5pirnie.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C63AF27E38B9C2000002C5pirnie.org Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;pirnie.org Received-From-MTA: dns;DWS047.cflib.org Arrival-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:02:16 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 --9B095B5ADSN=_01C63AF27E38B9C2000002C5pirnie.org Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from DWS047.cflib.org ([199.231.128.19]) by pirnie.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:02:16 -0800 Received: from mail78.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.131]) by cflib.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:09:40 -0500 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-78.messagelabs.com!1141257856!43184543!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.9.1; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [193.123.132.230] Received: (qmail 16002 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2006 00:04:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server80.rocom.co.uk) (193.123.132.230) by server-7.tower-78.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 00:04:17 -0000 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:04:56 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C636AB385A1C9800018EDAserver80.rocom.c" X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 00000001 - 80040546 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CFCDev] Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Precedence: bulk Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2006 01:02:16.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2BD6370:01C63D94] This is a MIME-formatted message. Portions of this message may be unreadable without a MIME-capable mail program. --9B095B5ADSN=_01C636AB385A1C9800018EDAserver80.rocom.c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C636AB385A1C9800018EDAserver80.rocom.c Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;server80.rocom.co.uk Received-From-MTA: dns;mail82.messagelabs.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:04:56 +0000 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 --9B095B5ADSN=_01C636AB385A1C9800018EDAserver80.rocom.c Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from mail82.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.67] unverified) by server80.rocom.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:04:56 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: [email protected] X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-82.messagelabs.com!1141257835!19904359!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.9.1; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [199.231.128.19] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.6 required=7.0 tests=BODY_RANDOM_LONG, NO_REAL_NAME Received: (qmail 30644 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2006 00:03:56 -0000 Received: from 199-231-128-19.rev.sdf.hosting.com (HELO DWS047.cflib.org) (199.231.128.19) by server-15.tower-82.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 00:03:56 -0000 Received: from gateway1.jhsph.edu ([162.129.40.71]) by cflib.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:52:50 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO owa-2.sph.ad.jhsph.edu) ([172.30.34.243]) by gateway1.jhsph.edu with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2006 18:47:33 -0500 X-SBRS-GW1: None X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,158,1139202000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="37570606:sNHT256608332" From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:47:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C63398C015E50600002163owa?2.sph.ad.jhs" X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 00000001 - 80040546 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CFCDev] Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Precedence: bulk Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2006 00:04:56.0031 (UTC) FILETIME=[F024FEF0:01C63D8C] This is a MIME-formatted message. Portions of this message may be unreadable without a MIME-capable mail program. --9B095B5ADSN=_01C63398C015E50600002163owa?2.sph.ad.jhs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C63398C015E50600002163owa?2.sph.ad.jhs Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;owa-2.sph.ad.jhsph.edu Received-From-MTA: dns;gw1lservnet.jhsph.edu Arrival-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:47:32 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 --9B095B5ADSN=_01C63398C015E50600002163owa?2.sph.ad.jhs Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from gw1lservnet.jhsph.edu ([172.30.34.6]) by owa-2.sph.ad.jhsph.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:47:32 -0500 Received: from 199-231-128-19.rev.sdf.hosting.com (HELO DWS047.cflib.org) ([199.231.128.19]) by gw1lservnet.jhsph.edu with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2006 18:47:17 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-SBRS-GW1: 5.5 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,158,1139202000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="37570597:sNHT38686145398" Received: from mail12.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.14]) by cflib.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:52:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 22996 invoked for bounce); 1 Mar 2006 23:46:47 -0000 Date: 1 Mar 2006 23:46:47 -0000 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Subject: [CFCDev] failure notice Precedence: bulk Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2006 23:47:32.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[82114970:01C63D8A] Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail12.sea5.speakeasy.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. For additional assistance, please contact Speakeasy Customer Support via one of the following methods: o Phone: 800.556.5829 (Seattle-area, please call 206.728.9770); o Email: From your Speakeasy or primary contact email address, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your issue; o Online: Login to MySpeakeasy (http://www.speakeasy.net/myspeak) and select Customer Support from the navigation menu. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: maildrop: maildir over quota. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: (qmail 16869 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2006 23:46:39 -0000 Received: from 199-231-128-19.rev.sdf.hosting.com (HELO DWS047.cflib.org) ([199.231.128.19]) (envelope-sender <[email protected]>) by mail12.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 1 Mar 2006 23:46:38 -0000 Received: from blmail01bos.io.askjeeves.info ([65.214.39.154]) by cflib.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:51:45 -0500 Received: (qmail 7441 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2006 23:46:28 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 1 Mar 2006 23:46:28 -0000 From: Bloglines Bounce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: [CFCDev] Error Precedence: bulk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, There has been an error processing your email. The error is: This email was sent to an invalid address. For the correct email address to submit emails, please visit http://www.bloglines.com and view the My Blogs page. Your request has not been processed. Below is a copy of your original email. The email was originally sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bloglines Team -- Original Message: Received: (qmail 7431 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2006 23:46:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO DWS047.cflib.org) (199.231.128.19) by 0 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2006 23:46:27 -0000 Received: from smtp03.safesecureweb.com ([65.36.154.50]) by cflib.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:51:36 -0500 Received: from mail14.safesecureweb.com (unknown [192.168.2.135]) by smtp03.safesecureweb.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EA57C2F5F62 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:46:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from 68-67-253-41.frdrmd.adelphia.net [68.67.253.41] by mail14.safesecureweb.com with SMTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:52:20 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:45:33 -0500 From: Jason Daiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CFCDev] DAO vs. Gateway? References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040408040403080403020008" X-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at safesecureweb.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040408040403080403020008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My .02 on the DAO's getting huge is the same response given when Model Glue folks that complain the configuration file that is too long. Use a good editor and you probably won't even notice the size. For me managing 2 small files is a bigger pain than 1 large file. Also, I'm not making any comments on the editor folks are using (obviously since I have no idea what people are using) but I've found the code collapse w/in Eclipse eliminates the big file concern for me. Thus I'm left with the 'keep track of 1 or 2 files' issue and I simply choose 1 approach. I have yet to hear of a design reason why the 2 file approach is better or why a 1 file approach would break the design pattern both approaches strive to achieve. In the end, it seems like personal preference. Now if someone tells me the 1file approach breaks down because of X or breaks a design pattern b/c of Y then I'm all ears. Until then, it's 1 file for me. Peter J. Farrell wrote: > Kurt Wiersma said the following on 3/1/2006 12:52 PM: > >> Like Chris Scott, I have found that the Java convention seems to be >> having all the code in a DAO class. In my CF apps I have found I >> really like having the gateway separate because in Java I have found >> my DAOs get huge with all the different methods that sometimes have to >> be added for reporting purposes. >> >> --Kurt >> > Ditto! Although I don't do any Java developing, I have found that DAO > classes with everything gets unwieldy after a bit of time. Also, I like > the idea of having my DAO access single records, while the Gateway is > one or more. Secondly, typically my DAOs return populated beans while > the Gateways returns cf query objects. > > .Peter > > -- Jason Daiger URL: www.jdaiger.com EML: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] --------------040408040403080403020008 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> My .02 on the DAO's getting huge is the same response given when Model Glue folks that complain the configuration file that is too long. Use a good editor and you probably won't even notice the size. For me managing 2 small files is a bigger pain than 1 large file. Also, I'm not making any comments on the editor folks are using (obviously since I have no idea what people are using) but I've found the code collapse w/in Eclipse eliminates the big file concern for me. Thus I'm left with the 'keep track of 1 or 2 files' issue and I simply choose 1 approach. I have yet to hear of a design reason why the 2 file approach is better or why a 1 file approach would break the design pattern both approaches strive to achieve. In the end, it seems like personal preference. Now if someone tells me the 1file approach breaks down because of X or breaks a design pattern b/c of Y then I'm all ears. Until then, it's 1 file for me.<br> <br> <br> <br> Peter J. Farrell wrote: <blockquote cite="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Kurt Wiersma said the following on 3/1/2006 12:52 PM: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Like Chris Scott, I have found that the Java convention seems to be having all the code in a DAO class. In my CF apps I have found I really like having the gateway separate because in Java I have found my DAOs get huge with all the different methods that sometimes have to be added for reporting purposes. --Kurt </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!---->Ditto! Although I don't do any Java developing, I have found that DAO classes with everything gets unwieldy after a bit of time. Also, I like the idea of having my DAO access single records, while the Gateway is one or more. Secondly, typically my DAOs return populated beans while the Gateways returns cf query objects. .Peter </pre> </blockquote> <br> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Jason Daiger URL: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.jdaiger.com";>www.jdaiger.com</a> EML: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a></pre> </body> </html> ----------------------------------------------------------<BR>You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.<BR><BR>CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).<BR><BR>An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] --------------040408040403080403020008-- ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C63398C015E50600002163owa?2.sph.ad.jhs-- --9B095B5ADSN=_01C636AB385A1C9800018EDAserver80.rocom.c-- --9B095B5ADSN=_01C63AF27E38B9C2000002C5pirnie.org-- ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
