Funny,
I was just looking at those again today! I think the problem was the same as
with a lot of generic CRUD frameworks. You need to have enough extensibility
mechanisms to cover enough edge cases to make the approach worthwhile and when
you do that you have to do it really elegantly to avoid overloading people with
a bunch of concepts and work arounds that are more trouble than the problem they
are trying to solve.
---------------------------------------------------------------Original Message-----This almost seems like what cfinsert and cfupdate were supposed to do for us. It's a rare occasion that I've seen those tags used.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Williams
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] FW: Maintainability vs. reusability?
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com).
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
