cfinclude inside a CFC is how mixins are implemented, yes? So are you saying mixins smell bad?
Jaime Metcher > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rose, > Mitch > Sent: Thursday, 1 February 2007 7:44 AM > To: CFCDev@cfczone.org > Subject: [CFCDEV] Closures, mixins, and udf includes > > > Hi Folks, > > Syntactically, at least, I think I understand the differences, and I'm > guessing most of you would agree that using cfinclude within a cfc > 'smells bad'. > > But I'm unclear as to why one would choose one approach over another. > Could some smart folks with experience here could speak to the pros and > cons of each, and how usage might differ? > > Thanks > -m > > > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the > instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm > > CFCDev is supported by: > Katapult Media, Inc. > We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! > www.katapultmedia.com > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org > > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org
