Nando If you're working on your own and just starting with CFCs, I think you can just use returntype and type ="any" - i've thought about it from a variety of angles, and unless you are trained in a typed language and using type makes a lot of sense to you, i don't think you'll get much benefit out of trying to use type in CF. My personal opinion here. Using type in certain development environments or in very complex apps can certainly be advantageous, but i wouldn't rubber stamp using type as a best practice automatically.
I've got a blog entry that explores this topic in depth if you're interested why i've come to this conclusion. http://aria-media.com/blog/index.cfm/2006/10/6/To-Type-or-Not-to-Type Nando I am new to cfcs. In the past I've used more strongly typed languages. So typing does make sense to me. On the one hand I like the security of type checking, but I think requiring full paths makes the code less portable. I just wanted to get a feel for what others are doing, and more importantly their reasoning, before making my own decision. Thanks for the link. I'll check it out. Janet -- --------------------------------- Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm CFCDev is supported by: Katapult Media, Inc. We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock! www.katapultmedia.com An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
