On 7/3/07, Jaime Metcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
much more intelligent exposition here:
http://gbracha.blogspot.com/2007/06/constructors-considered-harmful.html
And of course since CF is a dynamic language, none of that article
actually applies to CF. One of Gilad's main complaints is that you
can't return arbitrary objects from a constructor - which you can in
CF (and I do it in Fusebox 5.5 - because it introduces a new type of
circuit and the code can only figure it out half way through the
constructor so it decides which type of circuit to return from init()
- and they are not related by inheritance).
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, please follow the instructions at
http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm
CFCDev is supported by:
Katapult Media, Inc.
We are cool code geeks looking for fun projects to rock!
www.katapultmedia.com
An archive of the CFCDev list is available at
www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org
