On 10/22/07, Matt Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe it is known or expected, but I was surprised it works. If you > pass arguments to a function, but don't declare them via the > cfargument tag, it exists anyway. You lose the name of the argument, > but can still access it via the arguments struct.
How would you reference those arguments otherwise? Could you explain *why* you thought the arguments scope would not exist if no arguments were passed? I'm curious as to your logic here. You know that you can always pass more arguments to a function than are declared (or maybe not and that's what led you to this position)? -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
