I'm not sure. Sean's version caches the metadata info after the first call, and since your version uses a List and Evaluate(), I'm still thinking the metadata-based approach would probably be faster. It would make for an interesting test.
On 10/23/07, Baz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's probably not the fastest piece of code you'll ever run, but my gut > tells me its faster than introspecting the metadata and looping through > that. Plus in the elegance department, I think its the lesser of two evils. > > Ben Nadel is always running intricate performance tests comparing > different bits of code. I wonder if he'd be interested in this case. > > Baz > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
