What sucks is that during the Scorpio beta tour, they told us they had nested transactions working. I'm not sure what happened to cause them to remove it, but that would be such a useful feature that I'm sorry they couldn't keep it in.
On 10/27/07, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/27/07, Sam Larbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a big fan of continuous improvement. > > I'm not. > > I used to be but I'm taking a more pragmatic approach now-a-days. > Sending code into the big bad world, never to see it again, and having > my reputation rest on it's success or otherwise. Get it right, get it > out. > > but back to the origional question: looks like there's no magic > bullet, nothing has changed since I last grappled with these problems > (except I'm using Remoting more, making the issue more accute). > > it sounds like the only solution is the "big design up-front", where > processes that need to sit within a transaction can be identified and > catered for at the start. not quite as agile as I'd like... > > ... nesting transactions, that'd fix it. CF9 wishlist perhaps? > > oh well... > > thanx > barry.b > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
