I believe the trick with this is that code metrics like that would require a CF runtime engine in CFE, making it a bit of a pain to implement.
Best Wishes, Peter On 10/29/07 7:23 PM, "Barry Beattie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had a chance to use code coverage tools for Java in conjunction with > unit testing - hadn't used them before and I was impressed with the > concept. > > it was especially good for seeing what code didn't run with the unit > tests (showing holes in the tests themselves). > > I *could* sit there going line-by-line thru the new debugger or litter > the code with logging traces - but seeing (easily) what code ran with > the unit tests and what didn't was quite cool. > > I may be out of luck with the runtime nature of CF verses the > compiling of Java code. but i'm still curious... > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
