I wasn't actually saying it was problematic, it is an FYI and I only brought it up because if you expect it to behave like Java or .Net there are going to be a few caveats.
Nothing more than thatJ Andrew Scott Senior Coldfusion Developer Aegeon Pty. Ltd. www.aegeon.com.au Phone: +613 9015 8628 Mobile: 0404 998 273 From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Kotek Sent: Thursday, 24 April 2008 4:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [CFCDEV] Re: intialising cfcs Sure, but is this actually some kind of issue for you? OK, "private" in CF = "protected" in Java. I'd be interested to hear what else you have to bring up. By the way, there is no "true inheritance". As long as something follows Liskov's substitution principle, allows for method overriding, and in general allows an object to model an IS-A relationship, it qualifies as inheritance. I guess I'm just not following what there is about CF's particular implementation of inheritance that you find problematic. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
